-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Releasing control of a call without Hangup #40
Comments
I think it is reasonable, at least for v1.0, to assume that once a PCP becomes a DCP, it is so for the duration of the call. If a DCP wishes to go offline, it should do one of the following:
|
In the case of #2, does the spec address what happens when a DCP goes offline? Does the Rayo Server have the option of seeking another PCP to take the call? Perhaps we can add seeking another PCP as a "MAY" option for the server? |
When a DCP goes offline, the call should be dropped as if it encountered an error. The spec should (does?) state this. I think seeking another PCP would be complex on the client side (new call vs old one). |
This is the only reference I see to a CP going offline (in section 6.2.2 - Inbound Sessions): Once the server has offered control, it MUST wait indefinitely for a response from a PCP. The server SHOULD monitor the availability of PCPs to whom offers have been sent. If they all cease to be PCPs (eg by going offline) then the call should be rejected in the same way as if there had not been any available PCPs to begin with. |
Looks like this should be added to section 6.6 - Session Termination: 6.6 Session Termination Session termination may occur by one of several methods: An inbound call may be redirected by a PCP to some other target. |
Agreed approach is to specify that a DCP going offline should behave the same as an explicit hangup. |
Should it be possible for a DCP to release control of a call without hanging it up? This is similar to issue #39.
Example use-case: a DCP is going offline but wants another PCP to be able to control the call. Can it release the call back to the Rayo server such that another PCP can gain control?
This may be a special case of #39 and may be merged there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: