Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Add Framework Comparison Page #109

Open
RLittlesII opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion: Add Framework Comparison Page #109

RLittlesII opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@RLittlesII
Copy link
Member

A few months ago, I was looking for a new JavaScript framework for a project I am working on. Several people in the community pointed me to VueJS. On their website they have a comparison page (https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/comparison.html) which listed the other popular frameworks and provided a comparison. It was a good faith comparison, that took an objective view at pro's and cons.

I wonder if we should do something like this on reactiveui.net? I think that it may help people understand where this framework shines. We could even call out which frameworks can coexist in the same project.

Frameworks up for comparison would be:

@reactiveui/learning-team @reactiveui/core-team Do we think this adds value? Please discuss!

@ghuntley
Copy link
Member

ghuntley commented May 15, 2018

I agree.

The foundations are in place see https://reactiveui.net/vs/

This convention was chosen as its SEO worthy. Folks are searching "reactiveui vs prism". Why not own it?

ReactiveUI is a composable, cross-platform model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms that is inspired by functional reactive programming which is a paradigm that allows you to express the idea around a feature in one readable place, abstract mutable state away from your user interfaces and improve improve the testability of your application.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants