Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PyZMQ improvements #326

Open
JensRantil opened this issue Oct 7, 2013 · 5 comments
Open

PyZMQ improvements #326

JensRantil opened this issue Oct 7, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@JensRantil
Copy link
Contributor

Improvements to http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/scenarios/network/#pyzmq; Mention that it supports in-process message passing, inter-process message passing and tcp message passing.

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Contributor

Playing devil's advocate but aren't those features of ∅MQ and not specific to PyZMQ? Do they warrant mentioning when speaking of a wrapper for that service?

@JensRantil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good call! I just read http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/notes/styleguide/#relevancy which states

Avoid including too much information on subjects that don’t directly relate to Python development.

I had not read the passage before. Instead I guess we should probably:

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Contributor

remove the list of "basic patterns" since it is not really relevant to Python

👍

Change the link

What about including both and giving the reader the option to choose which they wish to know more about? I had to do some ZMQ research recently and ended up using both as a reference. I still don't feel I know it (or its API) well enough to know which is more or less useful.

@JensRantil
Copy link
Contributor Author

What about including both and giving the reader the option to choose which they wish to know more about? I had to do some ZMQ research recently and ended up using both as a reference. I still don't feel I know it (or its API) well enough to know which is more or less useful.

👍 I'll see if I can make a pull request on this when I have the time.

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Contributor

👍 You're awesome

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants