Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Private leaderboard evaluation #26

Open
tommycarpi opened this issue Apr 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Private leaderboard evaluation #26

tommycarpi opened this issue Apr 17, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@tommycarpi
Copy link

I'd like to have some clarifications about the private leaderboard evaluation.
Is it the best score reached ever, or the corresponding value of the public leaderboard score?

I'll provide an example to be more clear

submission_x has:
public_leaderboard: 100
private_leaderboard: 90

while submission_y has:
public_leaderboard: 95
private_leaderboard: 95

Clearly in the public leaderboard my team would score 100 (submission_x), but what for the private?
Will it be 90 or 95??

@desertnaut
Copy link

I have seen no mention for such a public/private leaderboard distinction (in contrast to Kaggle contests, where it is explicitly mentioned in the rules for each competition). Can we please have a clarification here?

@tommycarpi
Copy link
Author

I assumed there is a Private Leaderboard based on the fact that here, under the Prizes Section, it is explicitly said that the Public Leaderboard is based on 1/3 of the ground truth data.

@desertnaut
Copy link

Good spot - it had gone under my radar, thanks

@fabianabel
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry for the late reply. Yes, the public leaderboard is based on 1/3 of the ground truth data. The final leaderboard with the official results will be released on June 29th (a few ays after the challenge finished) and will be based on 100% of the ground truth data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants