Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Principal investigators & Creators confusing in ReDBox #54

Open
grantj-re3 opened this issue Oct 16, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Principal investigators & Creators confusing in ReDBox #54

grantj-re3 opened this issue Oct 16, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@grantj-re3
Copy link

I find the definitions related to Principal investigators & Creators confusing in ReDBox.

  1. "Principal investigator" in the DMPT & Selfsub workflows map to "Creator [PI]" in the main workflow. However, main workflow help-text implies PI means 'Partner Investigator'. If the help text is accurate (see item 2 below) then I would have expected that "Principal investigator" might map better to "Creator [CI]" where CI means 'Chief Investigator'.

  2. It appears to me from the field names in the tfpackage file (in ReDBox storage for items in the main workflow) that:

  • CI/Chief Investigator in the GUI corresponds to "dc:creator.foaf:Person.N.redbox:isCoPrimaryInvestigator": "on"
  • PI/Partner Investigator in the GUI corresponds to "dc:creator.foaf:Person.N.redbox:isPrimaryInvestigator": "on"

Those relationships do not seem logical to me. However, the field names do seem to be consistent with the mapping described in item 1 above (ie. Principal investigator in DMPT/Selfsub maps to Primary Investigator field) but implies that the main workflow help-text is misleading. So perhaps ReDBox could be self-consistent if in the main workflow:

  • PI meant Principal (or Primary) investigator &
  • CI meant Co-primary investigator

However, I would prefer the self-consistent & externally consistent solution below.

POTENTIAL SOLUTION

The main workflow help-definitions of CI & PI fit well with ARC & NHMRC definitions eg. http://www.arc.gov.au/applicants/eligibility_matters.htm. So perhaps the solution is to change almost everything except the help text to fit ARC/NHMRC definitions which researchers are more likely to understand. That is:

  1. In DMPT/Selfsub workflows, change "Principal investigator" to "Chief investigator". Make corresponding changes to DMPT/Selfsub help text. Make it map to "Creator [CI]" in the main workflow. Keep main workflow help text unchanged.

  2. For field names in the tfpackage file (in ReDBox storage for items in the main workflow) make:

  • PI/Partner Investigator in the GUI correspond to "dc:creator.foaf:Person.N.redbox:isCoPrimaryInvestigator": "on"
  • CI/Chief Investigator in the GUI correspond to "dc:creator.foaf:Person.N.redbox:isPrimaryInvestigator": "on"

Hope this makes sense. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant