Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Server side Grid UI #459

Closed
raoulvdberge opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Server side Grid UI #459

raoulvdberge opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@raoulvdberge
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add pagination to avoid reaching the packet limit
    • This should be seamless and load additional rows when scrolling to the bottom (lazy-loaded)
    • It should load a few rows extra so you can at least start scrolling
  • Because we can't guarantee that all resources are in by default, we need to move querying and sorting to the server
  • Add a loading indicator while search is busy

We could move to a client model again in the future as a performance optimization.

@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 14, 2023
@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge added this to the v2.0.0-milestone.3 milestone Dec 14, 2023
@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge removed this from the v2.0.0-milestone.3 milestone Dec 25, 2023
@raoulvdberge
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is no longer necessary as NeoForge has built in packet splitting now.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Refined Storage 2 Mar 9, 2024
@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Mar 9, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant