Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
IMO:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
IMO:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I suggest changing It is not necessary to completely migrate the code of Although
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I know there has been a lot of blowback on Twitter about Remix v3 becoming React Router v7, but I wanted to open a discussion around the topic because I think it's an important discussion to have.
It just seems so painfully obvious that this rename is a mistake. By dropping the Remix name, you're losing all of the good will and reputation that the Remix brand has gained over the last few years. And on the flip side, by adopting React Router you're taking on all of the legacy baggage that comes with React Router.
You're also making it so much more difficult for developers to find the correct documentation. If I search on SO for a remix issue, I don't have to worry all that much about the answers being irrelevant to the version of Remix that I'm on because Remix hasn't been around that long and it hasn't changed all that much. But the same is not true with React Router. The internet is littered with articles about React Router that are no longer applicable to v6 or v7, but that's not always obvious to the reader.
The most frustrating aspect of this is that this is the absolute perfect opportunity to go the other direction and shed the baggage that comes with React Router. It's very frustrating to see it potentially squandered.
I hope this doesn't come across as an attack. I genuinely love Remix and I want to see it continue to grow and thrive, and I think branding is a big part of any framework's success.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions