Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show only physical items should filter out locations of type online #3594

Open
PascalRepond opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
effort: important US candidate enhancement Improvement of an existing feature stale Stale or no longer relevant

Comments

@PascalRepond
Copy link
Contributor

How it works

The facets to filter documents that are online or physical are missing a filter based on the location type. If an item has a location or temporary location that is is_online:true, they should be considered online documents.

Improvement suggestion

If a document has an item with a location that is is_online:true, the documents should be filtered out by the not_online document facet and displayed in the online facet.

This will probably require adding a field to the document index to give the information if an item is in a location of type online and making sure that the documents are reindexed when modyfying the location.

@PascalRepond PascalRepond added the enhancement Improvement of an existing feature label Feb 5, 2024
@PascalRepond PascalRepond moved this from Inbox to Product Backlog in RERO ILS issues Feb 5, 2024
@PascalRepond PascalRepond added the effort: important US candidate label Mar 12, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 6 months with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale or no longer relevant label Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
effort: important US candidate enhancement Improvement of an existing feature stale Stale or no longer relevant
Projects
Status: Product Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant