Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dockerfiles for lucid, precise, and saucy #10

Open
stuartpb opened this issue Jun 12, 2015 · 9 comments
Open

Dockerfiles for lucid, precise, and saucy #10

stuartpb opened this issue Jun 12, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@stuartpb
Copy link
Collaborator

Upstream provides packages for each of these:

It wouldn't be too tough to make Dockerfiles to install each of these, but since there's no tags for these versions in the official registry, it's kind of a moot point.

@stuartpb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Actually, Precise does have an upstream tag: https://registry.hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu/

@gabor-boros
Copy link
Member

@stuartpb can I close this issue? I believe this is not needed anymore since those distros have no support.

@stuartpb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

IMO, if a distro isn't supported, then it shouldn't be hosted under https://download.rethinkdb.com/apt/pool/

@gabor-boros
Copy link
Member

@stuartpb you are right. @srh what do you think if we remove the unsupported distros from the download server?

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

srh commented Dec 28, 2019

Why would we do that?

@stuartpb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

IMO, if a distro isn't supported, then it shouldn't be hosted under https://download.rethinkdb.com/apt/pool/

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

srh commented Dec 29, 2019

Why?

@gabor-boros
Copy link
Member

gabor-boros commented Jan 4, 2020

@srh, @stuartpb I had some time to think about this. As I can see, we should host the older binaries somewhere anyway as an "archive". For this repository, I would only keep those dockerfiles which are supported. Since the download server contains every package, anyone can have a dockerfile for an older RethinkDB version.

To conclude this, what if we:

  • removing the older dockerfiles from here (to keep this repo clean)
  • keeping all the packages on the download server
  • closing this issue

What is your opinion?

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

srh commented Jan 6, 2020

I'm not a user of the docker files, so I don't have any opinion on that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants