You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Basically the title. I came across this on a fresh arch install when I noticed the rust-analyzer was missing. Now, the way we handle missing packages is just by checking the keys, which does not suffice for Rustup (since the components are stored in InstallOptions and that is discarded).
One way to deal with this would be to convert them into an enum of components and toolchains, but I'm not sure how much of a 'hack' it'll be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't really want to make it a hacky method again like it was in pacdef, perhaps we could instead fix this by delegating the "is this package missing, and if so which bits do we need to install?" question to be have a per backend implementation. Something like:
I don't really want to make it a hacky method again like it was in pacdef, perhaps we could instead fix this by delegating the "is this package missing, and if so which bits do we need to install?" question to be have a per backend implementation. Something like:
Basically the title. I came across this on a fresh arch install when I noticed the rust-analyzer was missing. Now, the way we handle missing packages is just by checking the keys, which does not suffice for Rustup (since the components are stored in InstallOptions and that is discarded).
One way to deal with this would be to convert them into an enum of components and toolchains, but I'm not sure how much of a 'hack' it'll be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: