Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zfh ACT #18

Closed
2 of 13 tasks
jjscheel opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 18 comments
Closed
2 of 13 tasks

Zfh ACT #18

jjscheel opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 18 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor

jjscheel commented Mar 17, 2023

Technical Group

Architecture Test SIG

ratification-pkg

Zfh

Technical Liaison

Andrew Waterman

Task Category

Arch Tests

Task Sub Category

  • gcc
  • binutils
  • gdb
  • intrinsics
  • Java
  • KVM
  • ld
  • llvm
  • Linux kernel
  • QEMU
  • Spike

Ratification Target

4Q2021

Statement of Work (SOW)

Component names:

Requirements:
(prose describing what has to be done and what the end result is)

Deliverables:

  • Component 1 and changes expected.
  • Component 2 and changes expected.
    ...

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Component 1 and measured result.
  • Component 2 and measured result.
    ...

Projected timeframe: (best guess date)

SOW Signoffs: (delete those not needed)

  • Task group liaison sign-off date: N/A
  • Development partner sign-off date: 9/3/2024
  • ACT SIG sign-off date (if ACT work): 9/18/2024

Waiver

  • Freeze
  • Ratification

Pull Request Details

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Per email from Prasanna on 4/11:

Zfinix and Zfh : Scheduled a call tomorrow to discuss on the possible solution with respect to sign extension of Zfinix in RV64 (One of the comment provided) - In progress

@ptprasanna
Copy link

The requested changes are made as per the discussion we had with Incore. The Dry run is in-progress.

@ptprasanna
Copy link

This is completed with respect to the comments from Incore, but holding it up until we complete zfinx, before raising the PR.

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

jjscheel commented May 9, 2023

Thanks for the update, @ptprasanna. Good reminder. I knew this!!! (But, now we have it written in the issue. :-)

@jjscheel jjscheel mentioned this issue May 10, 2023
13 tasks
@ptprasanna
Copy link

Completed with the tests and coverage run. Have sent the tests for peer review before raising the PR.

@ptprasanna
Copy link

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done. Thanks!!!

@ptprasanna
Copy link

All the Comments that were provided are incorporated, and awaiting PR approval and merge..!

@anuani21
Copy link

anuani21 commented Sep 12, 2023

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good.

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ptprasanna, I would like an update in the issue, by the next meeting on December 12, 2023, please.

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

jjscheel commented Jan 9, 2024

Per @anuani21 in #20:

Zfinx and Zfh PR for ISAC has been merged.
riscv-software-src/riscv-isac#72

Zfinx and Zfh PR from CTG has been waiting for review.
riscv-software-src/riscv-ctg#67

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Per @anuani21 in #20:

Zfinx and Zfh PR from CTG has been waiting for review.
riscv-software-src/riscv-ctg#67

@jjscheel jjscheel mentioned this issue Apr 16, 2024
13 tasks
@jjscheel jjscheel moved this from As-planned to Blocked in RISC-V DevPartner Work Apr 16, 2024
@anuani21
Copy link

@UmerShahidengr, Please review the PR in riscv-ctg for Zfh and Zfinx extension, riscv-software-src/riscv-ctg#67
and commit.

@anuani21
Copy link

anuani21 commented Sep 3, 2024

@jjscheel,

All PR in riscv-ctg,riscv-isac and riscv-arch-test are merged for Zfh and Zfinx.

@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allenjbaum, can you kindly review the work here and signoff on its completion? A simple approval comment will suffice.

@allenjbaum
Copy link

They're all merged, it should be good to go

@jjscheel jjscheel moved this from Blocked to Late in RISC-V DevPartner Work Sep 18, 2024
@jjscheel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @allenjbaum!

@jjscheel jjscheel mentioned this issue Sep 18, 2024
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Late
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants