Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of draft-ietf-openpgp-persistent-symmetric-keys #2255

Open
falko-strenzke opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Implementation of draft-ietf-openpgp-persistent-symmetric-keys #2255

falko-strenzke opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@falko-strenzke
Copy link
Contributor

In our project we considering the implementation of draft-ietf-openpgp-persistent-symmetric-keys in RNP.
Currently the draft mainly addresses the re-encryption (and authentication) of existing messages with symmetric keys that are part of the users key ring for the purpose of local (or mailbox) storage. As discussed during the IETF 120 OpenPGP session, the author Daniel Huigens is considering to widen the scope of the draft to also support the usage of the persistent symmetric keys for the purpose of communication.

@ni4 @TJ-91
Would this draft be relevant for integration in RNP?

@kaie
Would Thunderbird care to use this feature to allow symmetric re-encryption or entirely symmetrically encrypted and authenticated e-mail communication?

@ni4
Copy link
Contributor

ni4 commented Jul 29, 2024

Could you please clarify why would you need this, given that it's in quite early stage and is not supported by any major implementations yet?
I don't think we should implement all the freshly-appeared stuff unless there is a practical need for that (like, major implementations, number of generated artifacts, and so on).

@falko-strenzke
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think it is currently implemented by any major implementation yet. Proton will for sure implement it, but as far as I understand specifically for re-encryption of messages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants