-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PCB idea #2
Comments
JLC used to have a minimum annular ring of 0.3mm on the small run proto orders but has moved down to .13mm for 1oz and .2mm for 2oz copper. Those numbers vary however from manufacturer to manufacturer, and larger batch runs typically grant you as the designer some extra freedom. As for the acid trap thing, that hasn't been an issue for a few decades anymore, especially in professionally manufactured PCBs. If you're diying with etchant, try adding a bubbler and possibly rotating the pcbs during etching. |
Most other manufactures add extra costs of having an annular ring smaller than 0,25. The yield will be less the smaller the annular ring will be. |
Not really. It's just a more involved process on 4 (or more) layer boards and little by little those processes are made available to lower count production runs too. Heck, can even get 4 layer boards at JLC for the price of a cheeseburger these days. |
Have you used other manufactures then jlc? |
Hey @oscarpeters and @C44Supra, So far I had no problems (or a higher fee) due to anything related to the PCB design. I highly appreciate your input and I'll leave this issue open until I am working on a new revision of this board. |
Hi, I have looked at the design and found some improvements if I may :)
Does your manufacturer introduce extra costs for your Via construction? because the

annular ring
of some of your via's are less than0.25mm
from the hole size.other improvements:



Could make this a 3v3 plane:

lastly when making large quantities of these boards and maximum throughput from the pcb fab, I should no go further than 90 degress with copper traces, in these corners ething fluid can ingress and over time ruin the track.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: