Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PCB idea #2

Open
oscarpeters opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

PCB idea #2

oscarpeters opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@oscarpeters
Copy link

oscarpeters commented Feb 1, 2023

Hi, I have looked at the design and found some improvements if I may :)

Does your manufacturer introduce extra costs for your Via construction? because the annular ring of some of your via's are less than 0.25mm from the hole size.
image

other improvements:
image
image
image

Could make this a 3v3 plane:
image

lastly when making large quantities of these boards and maximum throughput from the pcb fab, I should no go further than 90 degress with copper traces, in these corners ething fluid can ingress and over time ruin the track.
image

@C44Supra
Copy link

C44Supra commented Feb 8, 2023

JLC used to have a minimum annular ring of 0.3mm on the small run proto orders but has moved down to .13mm for 1oz and .2mm for 2oz copper. Those numbers vary however from manufacturer to manufacturer, and larger batch runs typically grant you as the designer some extra freedom.

As for the acid trap thing, that hasn't been an issue for a few decades anymore, especially in professionally manufactured PCBs. If you're diying with etchant, try adding a bubbler and possibly rotating the pcbs during etching.

@oscarpeters
Copy link
Author

Most other manufactures add extra costs of having an annular ring smaller than 0,25. The yield will be less the smaller the annular ring will be.

@C44Supra
Copy link

C44Supra commented Feb 9, 2023

Not really. It's just a more involved process on 4 (or more) layer boards and little by little those processes are made available to lower count production runs too. Heck, can even get 4 layer boards at JLC for the price of a cheeseburger these days.

@oscarpeters
Copy link
Author

Have you used other manufactures then jlc?

@robin7331
Copy link
Owner

Hey @oscarpeters and @C44Supra,

So far I had no problems (or a higher fee) due to anything related to the PCB design.
Also the development of this very first release is done. Meaning I am not planning on doing any additional EMI testing for this revision. That means I'll not change anything on the design if not super cricital.

I highly appreciate your input and I'll leave this issue open until I am working on a new revision of this board.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants