From ea0ca24507ebc9ba88f18d99d5821d49ec4e1f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Guyton Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 12:15:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] review - 'currently' as in flux re btrfs status #468 Co-authored-by: Hooverdan96 <35113775+Hooverdan96@users.noreply.github.com> --- interface/storage/pools-btrfs.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/interface/storage/pools-btrfs.rst b/interface/storage/pools-btrfs.rst index b04a50b..f34df05 100644 --- a/interface/storage/pools-btrfs.rst +++ b/interface/storage/pools-btrfs.rst @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ raid5 Can sustain **a maximum of one drive failure**. Two or more drives are required. Uses parity and striping. -The BTRFS community consensus is that btrfs raid5 is ***not recommended for production/metadata use***. +The BTRFS community consensus is that btrfs raid5 is currently ***not recommended for production/metadata use***. .. _raid6: