You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A while back, Roblox renamed all of their Content properties to be a ContentId type. We patched over this in #455 by just using ContentId in lieu of Content for things.
Given that as far as I can tell all of these properties serialize, we should put in the work to actually document this type and implement it.
Unfortunately this means we need to consider the future of rbx_type's Content type. Ideally we would just rename the old Content type to ContentId like Roblox and then add a new Content type but this is a breaking change. :(
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A while back, Roblox renamed all of their
Content
properties to be aContentId
type. We patched over this in #455 by just usingContentId
in lieu ofContent
for things.However, there are now properties that utilize the new
Content
type:Given that as far as I can tell all of these properties serialize, we should put in the work to actually document this type and implement it.
Unfortunately this means we need to consider the future of rbx_type's
Content
type. Ideally we would just rename the oldContent
type toContentId
like Roblox and then add a newContent
type but this is a breaking change. :(The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: