-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing Derivative Gain for Position Command #377
Comments
Afaik the proportional gain is just added to make the physics engine work. Control tasks should be implemented in your ros2_controller. |
I understand that, but I don't want to add my control tasks into the plugin, I would like to implement a better way in which position commands are sent to the joints to simulate the internal dynamic of my motors and make the simulation more realistic. Thanks for your fast response. |
That's exactly what the linked PR wants to achieve. Contributions are very welcome :) |
Thank you so much |
Currently, the
gz_ros2_control
package implements only a proportional gain control for position commands.Is there a specific reason why only proportional gain is implemented without derivative gain in the position control strategy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: