Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional return value to the hardware_interface::return_type #815

Closed
destogl opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1279
Closed

Add additional return value to the hardware_interface::return_type #815

destogl opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1279

Comments

@destogl
Copy link
Member

destogl commented Sep 21, 2022

That's exactly what I am thinking too. So we call it "SKIPPED" instead of "NOT_EXECUTED". Is this correct?

Originally posted by @destogl in #805 (comment)

@bailaC
Copy link
Contributor

bailaC commented Dec 3, 2023

@destogl I can give it a try. Please comment if it is ok.

@destogl
Copy link
Member Author

destogl commented Dec 14, 2023

This is addressed in #1175

@destogl destogl linked a pull request Dec 14, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants