Period between 2024-01-07 and 2024-01-31 inclusive
- These reports: https://github.com/rphair/cip-editing
- GitHub activity overview: https://github.com/rphair
- Discord invite to CIP Editors Meetings: https://discord.gg/kyaTyzkBqd
- CIP open pull requests: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pulls
- CIP open issues: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/issues
Quantitative contributions:
- CIP pull requests @rphair involved in, by last update time
- CIP issues @rphair involved in, by last update time
Final discussions with editors and long time community reviewers to complete my updates to the CIP and CIPs templates begun in the last monthly cycle, regaring References and other optional sections and how versioning is handled (with options for integrating into document or providing a Versioning section):
- cardano-foundation/CIPs#730 (to update CIP format)
- cardano-foundation/CIPs#731
- cardano-foundation/CIPs#756 (to update CPS format)
Should repeat spammers to the CIP repository be banned? So far editor concensus is no, but only because none of the editors have privileges to block anyone. Keeping an eye on this matter, e.g.:
#444 - CIP-0113? | Programmable token-like assets
- Helping to revive an old proposal (called "ERC20-like assets") to give it a proper title and convene the right devs and subject matter experts to give it a proper review and launch as an updated CIP, with many comments beginning here (cardano-foundation/CIPs#444 (review))
#619 - CPS-0010? | Wallet Connectors
- Passing in conclusion after demanding review & community input (cardano-foundation/CIPs#619 (review))
#625 - CPS-0012? | Query Layer Standardization
- Preliminary passing review, after being in spotlight for a while in Wallet Dev community with a lot of support for it (cardano-foundation/CIPs#625 (review)) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#625 (review))
#638 - CPS-0013? | Better builtin data structures in Plutus
- Preliminary review at MPJ request (cardano-foundation/CIPs#638 (review))
- Requesting qualification of hanging, unqualified Twitter link in CPS (which has still never been done) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#638 (review)) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#638 (comment))
#641 - CIP-0109? | Modular Exponentiation Built-in for Plutus Core
- Review and gathering subject matter experts to get this old proposal moving again, e.g. (cardano-foundation/CIPs#641 (review))
#736 - CIP-100 | Small clean up on example files
- Answering editorial question about whether canonical links should go to GitHub (preferred) or
cips.cardano.org(used occasionally but deprecated) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#736 (comment))
#737 - CIP-0005 | Distinguish between key based and script based conway credentials
- Key update needed for Conway: passing review (cardano-foundation/CIPs#737 (review))
#742 - CPS-0011? | Universal JSON Encoding for Domain Types
- Approving review for well received idea (cardano-foundation/CIPs#742 (review))
#747 - CIP-???? | Explicit script return values
- Preliminary review of Plutus proposal at MPJ request (cardano-foundation/CIPs#747 (review))
#748 - CIP-0100 | Add index and hash to references and allow for basic HTML tags
- Consideration of whether HTML or Markdown is most suitable for governance proposals (cardano-foundation/CIPs#748 (comment))
#752 - CIP-0114? | CBOR Tags Registry
- Properly classifying this group of 3 proposals as
Tools, eliminating some confusion:
#753 - CIP-0115? | CBOR tag definition - ED25519-BIP32 Keys
- Preliminary review of submission from Catalyst development (cardano-foundation/CIPs#753 (comment))
- Raising & ultimately settling questino about whether these 3 related proposals (2 CIPs + 1 CPS) are of submitted category
Metaor more properlyTools: - Confirming material is to be split between 1 CIP for the "framework" and one for each key definition (cardano-foundation/CIPs#753 (comment))
#754 - CIP-???? | Augment Spend Purpose
- Tentative suggestion not well outlined as a CIP (with deficiencies indicated in my review) and since closed by the author after unfavourable response from Plutus team (cardano-foundation/CIPs#754 (comment)) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#754 (comment))
#639 - CIP-0068: resolving conflicts with validity & auth tokens
- Triaging issue for user, recommending this as a CPS rather than a CIP, and providing a descriptive title for token devs to identify & provide input to the perceived problem (cardano-foundation/CIPs#639 (comment))
- Resolved with formation of new CPS (cardano-foundation/CIPs#640 (comment))
#79 - Tuesday 09 January 2024 (4PM UTC) - https://hackmd.io/@cip-editors/79
- Introduced, with preliminary review, a record-breaking 10 new CIPs between meetings.
- Merged long standing WebRTC CIP and progressed 2 well-discussed Plutus CIPs (cardano-foundation/CIPs#740)
#80 - Tuesday 23 January 2024 (4PM UTC) - https://hackmd.io/@cip-editors/80
- Full speed ahead with balance between new CIPs (5) and ongoing review (5).
- Great progress on CPSs with numbers assigned to 2 candidates (cardano-foundation/CIPs#750)