Common links & group KPIs:
- These reports: https://github.com/rphair/cip-editing
- Discord invite to CIP Editors Meetings: https://discord.gg/kyaTyzkBqd
- CIP open pull requests: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pulls
- CIP open issues: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/issues
Quantitative contributions:
- GitHub activity overview: @rphair
- CIP pull requests @rphair involved in, by last update time
- CIP issues @rphair involved in, by last update time
Acknowledged for contribution to candiate CIP-0120, the specification for the Cardano Constitution (https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pull/796/files/2abb461a12e5551eb32f053e28c08c9ec1e82a10..54204796a1f1f200ae7005f6d3b8b2d804e69401).
Update of CIP-0001 to encourage CIP authors to immediately link posted CIPs to their source documents, enabling immediate review by editors and community members while reducing this routine task in CIP editor workflow (cardano-foundation/CIPs#827).
Successful follow-up with GitHub Technical support for reincarnation (under different account) of malicious spammer targeting the CIP repository (fake issues #807 and #808 with spam documents and malicious code links).
CIP upstream bug fix for Developer Portal (emergency correction of editors' oversight) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#830)
#488 - CIP-???? | Extend token metadata for translations
- Upon author request, escalate re-review of year-old proposal stuck on editors' attempt to gather feedback from community implementors, specifically NMKR (cardano-foundation/CIPs#488 (review))
#587 - CIP-0103? | Web-Wallet Bridge - Bulk transaction signing
#588 - CIP-0104? | Web-Wallet Bridge - Account public key
- Final review coordination (with community reviewer assessing potential security risk) and merging these 2 long pending updates to Cardano wallet standards:
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#587 (review))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#588 (review))
#617 - CIP-0106? | Web-Wallet Bridge - Mutlisig wallets
- Review to move past apparent format problem in long standing proposal (cardano-foundation/CIPs#617 (comment))
#624 - CIP-0121? | Integer-ByteString conversions
- Month-long follow-up with IOG Plutus team to validate this proposal to reflect their current work on this language expansion (cardano-foundation/CIPs#624 (comment)) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#624 (comment))
- Review & coordination with MLabs author working on this & all related proposals (cardano-foundation/CIPs#624 (review))
- Corresponding editorial request on MLabs repository (mlabs-haskell/CIPs#8)
- Fixing some glitches in repository editing standards (cardano-foundation/CIPs#624 (comment))
#766 - CIP-0116? | Universal JSON Encoding for Domain Types
- Final review & merge (cardano-foundation/CIPs#766 (review))
#784 - CIP-0069 | add Datum to ScriptContext
- Final review: merging pending final changes by IOG Plutus Team (cardano-foundation/CIPs#784 (comment))
#788 - CIP-0119? | Governance Metadata - DReps
- Final review & merge (cardano-foundation/CIPs#788 (review))
#790 - CIP-???? | Dynamic Asset Resale Fees
- Deprecating proposal competitive to CIP-0102 (cardano-foundation/CIPs#790 (comment))
#795 - CIP-0083 | confirm openssl behaviour, fix command line example
- Final review: waiting for enough bandwidth at CIP meeting to merge (cardano-foundation/CIPs#795 (comment))
#796 - CIP-0120? | Constitution specification
- Confirming candidacy to begin month of robust online review (cardano-foundation/CIPs#796 (review))
- Disparity between common ₳ and rigid text format (suggesting narrow range of language-only characters) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#796 (comment))
- Further refining restrictions about enforcing "8-bit" (i.e. standard) characters & what that really means:
- Standards about punctuation and line length:
#798 - CIP-???? | Web-Wallet Bridge - Plutus wallets
- Fixing problem with CIP narrative (committing directly) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#798 (comment))
- High-level check & fix: what is a "Plutus wallet" specifically? (cardano-foundation/CIPs#798 (comment))
#800 - CIP-1694 | Bootstrap & other fixes
- Answering question about time- or organisational-dependent information being included in CIPs (cardano-foundation/CIPs#800 (comment))
- Final review & merge (cardano-foundation/CIPs#800 (comment))
- Approving French translation of update (cardano-foundation/CIPs#819 (review))
#806 - CIP-0122? | Logical operations over BuiltinByteString
- Call for Plutus expert review (cardano-foundation/CIPs#806 (review))
- Resolving similar (to CIP-0121) editorial issue about changing repository index (cardano-foundation/CIPs#806 (review))
- With CIP-0121, confirming deprecation of CIP-0058 (cardano-foundation/CIPs#806 (comment))
#809 - CIP-0068 | Allow [* bounded_bytes] for images
- After following community review all month, merging in aftermath of last month's last CIP meeting (cardano-foundation/CIPs#809 (comment))
#810 - CIP-???? | X509 RBAC Registration (1/5) - Metadata Envelope
- Five linked proposals submitted by Catalyst team when editors all agree that only 1 or 2 would do; making that point & then waiting for author feedback / response:
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#810 (review))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#810 (comment))
#815 - CIP-???? | Wallet best practices
- Question of whether this should really be a CIP or a CPS (cardano-foundation/CIPs#815 (comment))
#816 - CIP-???? | Efficient Proofs for Dynamic Sets
- Technically compelling proposal; initial review (cardano-foundation/CIPs#816 (review))
- Debate of whether this should be a "best practice" document rather than a CIP (cardano-foundation/CIPs#816 (comment))
- ... and whether it should be a CIP or a CPS (cardano-foundation/CIPs#816 (review)) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#816 (comment))
#825 - CIP-???? | Bitwise operations
- Initial review & call for Plutus expert confirmation (cardano-foundation/CIPs#825 (review))
- Possible merge with candidate CIP-0122; I don't see the necessity of it (cardano-foundation/CIPs#825 (comment))
- Confirmed likewise with 122 and 123 that it deprecates CIP 58 (cardano-foundation/CIPs#825 (comment)) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#831)
#826 - CIP-???? | Integration of ripemd_160 into Plutus
- Initial review & call for Plutus expert confirmation (difference since this coming outside the Plutus establishment) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#826 (review))
- Suggesting standard CIP title grouping for curve inclusions (cardano-foundation/CIPs#826 (comment))
#828 - CIP-0010 | Add oracle tx metadata tag to registry
- Confirming validity of new Oracle tag request from Iona / Orcfax (cardano-foundation/CIPs#828 (comment))
#832 - CIP-???? | A Plutus Subledger Enabling Native Asset Seizure
- Initial detailed format & narrative review (cardano-foundation/CIPs#832 (review))
- Conceptual & functional distinction from long time reviewed "Programmable Assets" CIP (cardano-foundation/CIPs#832 (comment))
None this term.
#88 - Tuesday 14 May 2024 (4PM UTC) - https://hackmd.io/@cip-editors/88
- Introduction of "Plutus Wallets", debate over omnibus CIPs from Catalyst team, merging several long-time submissions.
- Changes: cardano-foundation/CIPs#820
#89 - Tuesday 28 May 2024 (4PM UTC) - https://hackmd.io/@cip-editors/89
- Bitwise operations family of Plutus changes, and debate over CIP content for "best practices" or "design ideas" submissions (considered over cardano-foundation/CIPs#816)
- Changes: cardano-foundation/CIPs#829