Skip to content

Handling non-standard access #291

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
i509VCB opened this issue Mar 15, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Handling non-standard access #291

i509VCB opened this issue Mar 15, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@i509VCB
Copy link

i509VCB commented Mar 15, 2025

In the TI MSPM0 SVDs, some registers use the non-standard read-writeonce access. For obvious reasons this is going to result in a parse error.

Would there be any objections to an addition to just map this access type to read-write (whether to guard it behind a flag is a different question)?
@burrbull
Copy link
Member

read-writeonce => read-writeOnce

@burrbull
Copy link
Member

#277

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@burrbull @i509VCB