Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Nominating non-local lifetimes (daddy borrowck) for meeting discussion #85

Closed
SoniEx2 opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Nominating non-local lifetimes (daddy borrowck) for meeting discussion #85

SoniEx2 opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@SoniEx2
Copy link

SoniEx2 commented Mar 6, 2023

RFC PR rust-lang/rfcs#3390 we'd like to see t-types thoughts on the way we reject empty lifetimes and define lifetimes which may already be expired. The main concern is how these interact with the type system, while the interaction with code is fairly straightforward.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SoniEx2