Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix up data #1

Open
ryanmuller opened this issue Jan 29, 2012 · 9 comments
Open

Fix up data #1

ryanmuller opened this issue Jan 29, 2012 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@ryanmuller
Copy link
Owner

  • Labels for everything
  • Names for definitions and theorems (cross-referenced with Rudin text)
  • Remove superfluous labels
  • Check for mistakes
  • Make sure video syncs are correct
  • Type up theorems and definitions not covered in video
@npisenti
Copy link
Collaborator

How far did you get on this...? Looks like everything is categorized now; is there any other editing that needs to be done?

@ryanmuller
Copy link
Owner Author

Don't remember how far I got with associations, but not sure we'll even use
those... Just general make sure stuff isn't sloppy/wrong/etc. But we can
work those out as we find them.

2012/3/13 Neal Pisenti <
[email protected]

How far did you get on this...? Looks like everything is categorized now;
is there any other editing that needs to be done?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1 (comment)

@ryanmuller
Copy link
Owner Author

Going to reopen for naming everything, and also doing more cleanup, especially by adding linebreaks.

For things without obvious names: we could go by the definition/theorem number in the book. Then should we do that for everything for search purposes?

@ryanmuller ryanmuller reopened this Mar 15, 2012
@npisenti
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe we could add a "hidden" name field which would contain the book
definition/theorem number to be searched, but not display visibly to the
user.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, cicatriz <
[email protected]

wrote:

Going to reopen for naming everything, and also doing more cleanup,
especially by adding linebreaks.

For things without obvious names: we could go by the definition/theorem
number in the book. Then should we do that for everything for search
purposes?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1 (comment)

Neal Pisenti
[email protected]

@npisenti
Copy link
Collaborator

What are your thoughts on the commentary? We could make it display depending on a user setting, or on a toggle button on the main page, or leave it out entirely (currently what's happening)...?

@npisenti
Copy link
Collaborator

We seem to be missing notes from lecture 14...

@ryanmuller
Copy link
Owner Author

Just grabbed it from the server. I'll work on sorting it out.

2012/3/15 Neal Pisenti <
[email protected]

We seem to be missing notes from lecture 14...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1 (comment)

@ryanmuller
Copy link
Owner Author

Whaaaat... looks like 14 got mislabeled as 13 and they are currently
interleaved but separable by video id. Fixing that now.

2012/3/15 Ryan Muller [email protected]

Just grabbed it from the server. I'll work on sorting it out.

2012/3/15 Neal Pisenti <
[email protected]

We seem to be missing notes from lecture 14...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1 (comment)

@npisenti
Copy link
Collaborator

npisenti commented Apr 9, 2012

Other things to look for: there are some items with missing ( ) LaTeX braces. This'll probably take paging through all of the items on the server, and looking for ones that didn't render properly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants