Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alphabetical sorting #12

Open
honsiorovskyi opened this issue Jul 3, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Alphabetical sorting #12

honsiorovskyi opened this issue Jul 3, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@honsiorovskyi
Copy link

It would be nice to have an opportunity to sort the list of buffers alphabeticaly or at least display them always in the same order, because searching every time through the new list to find a proper buffer is a bit complicated.

@sandeepcr529
Copy link
Owner

yes..I was already planning to implement this...thank you for your input
though...

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Denis Gonsiorovsky <[email protected]

wrote:

It would be nice to have an opportunity to sort the list of buffers
alphabeticaly or at least display them always in the same order, because
searching every time through the new list to find a proper buffer is a bit
complicated.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/12
.

@sandeepcr529
Copy link
Owner

have pushed a patch..please check and let me know......

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Denis Gonsiorovsky <[email protected]

wrote:

It would be nice to have an opportunity to sort the list of buffers
alphabeticaly or at least display them always in the same order, because
searching every time through the new list to find a proper buffer is a bit
complicated.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/12
.

@honsiorovskyi
Copy link
Author

Great! Thank you. It would be also very nice to have a global variable where one can set the default sort behaviour.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants