What kind of breaking changes would it make sens to introduce in 1.0.0? #386
Closed
MateuszKubuszok
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
It seems we managed to avoid most of the changes so far, only addressing (in a backward compatible way) rename Coproduct -> Subtype since it something more people would understand. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Since 1.0.0 would set API in stone it would make sense to clean up before the release whatever we already see as clumsy or user unfriendly.
Some changes that I can think of:
withFieldConst
->fieldConst
orsetField
,withFieldComputed
->fieldComputed
orupdateField
(the later being inspired with lenses, since it is a very generic lens, kinda)Coproduct
->Subtype
since it something more people would understandpartial.Result
name with something that works better with IDEsWhat else would be a good candidate?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions