You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is followup for: #427
According to scylladb/cassandra-stress#38 (comment) there is still difference between Shuffled and not shuffled replicas, which made me think that array shuffling operations are very expensive.
Solution to that would be lazy shuffling, when original replica list is preserved as is while next item is being randomizes only when it is needed.
We need to do that and see if there is performance difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is followup for: #427
According to scylladb/cassandra-stress#38 (comment) there is still difference between Shuffled and not shuffled replicas, which made me think that array shuffling operations are very expensive.
Solution to that would be lazy shuffling, when original replica list is preserved as is while next item is being randomizes only when it is needed.
We need to do that and see if there is performance difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: