Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Hosting Package on MELPA #4

Open
bhgomes opened this issue Jan 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Consider Hosting Package on MELPA #4

bhgomes opened this issue Jan 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
backlog Queued for work but unfortunately at a lower priority

Comments

@bhgomes
Copy link

bhgomes commented Jan 4, 2020

Hi @seanfarley. I'm very much interested in using your package. It would be super convenient if it were on MELPA so I could install it with use-package instead of holding a copy of the bitwarden.el file. Thanks so much.

@seanfarley
Copy link
Owner

Hi there and thanks for the interest!

I've been thinking about what it would take to get this package moving forward and releasing it on melpa. A few things I worry about are:

  • there's no way currently to create / modify a password
  • bitwarden added multiple levels of folders after I hardcoded only one level; I'm not sure I want the complexity of a hierarchy of folders

Then again, this is providing a useful feature (reading passwords) so I might just release it on melpa as-is and hope others can help with the issues above :-)

Anyways, I'm really busy with things this month so I won't be able to test the PR and release this to melpa as quick as I'd like :-/

@zoechi
Copy link
Contributor

zoechi commented Feb 13, 2020

(use-package quelpa-use-package
  :ensure t)
;; Bitwarden integration
(use-package bitwarden
  :ensure nil
  :quelpa (bitwarden
           :fetcher github
	   :repo "seanfarley/emacs-bitwarden"))

works well for me

@seanfarley
Copy link
Owner

That's basically what I'm using (though it's built into doom emacs for me) but I'll eventually put it on melpa.

@seanfarley seanfarley added the backlog Queued for work but unfortunately at a lower priority label Feb 14, 2020
@seanfarley seanfarley self-assigned this Feb 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog Queued for work but unfortunately at a lower priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants