Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disabeling Info for rzls #136

Closed
tilupe opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 4 comments
Closed

Disabeling Info for rzls #136

tilupe opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@tilupe
Copy link

tilupe commented Jan 20, 2025

Since I don't have rz-ls installed I can't use the plugin with rzls.nvim.
But I constantly get the following message and have to click it away sometimes several times..

Image

I didn't see any way to disable this message. Did I miss something?

Or if you know an easy way to install rz-ls on NixOS you can let me know too, then I would install rzls.nvim :)

@seblyng
Copy link
Owner

seblyng commented Jan 20, 2025

Ah, yeah I can see this being annoying...

I originally did it because of this: #77 but I think I can just remove it. I really don't want to add an option just to print or not print this warning message, and if I implement some silent option that silence everything, then I don't really like that as well, since users might be missing other important notifications then

@tris203
Copy link

tris203 commented Jan 23, 2025

Since I don't have rz-ls installed I can't use the plugin with rzls.nvim. But I constantly get the following message and have to click it away sometimes several times..

Image

I didn't see any way to disable this message. Did I miss something?

Or if you know an easy way to install rz-ls on NixOS you can let me know too, then I would install rzls.nvim :)

i have a flake here:
https://github.com/tris203/rzls.nvim/blob/flake/flake.nix

there is also a PR to add it to nixpkgs here:
NixOS/nixpkgs#371569

@tilupe

@tris203
Copy link

tris203 commented Jan 23, 2025

also you wouldnt need a config option to silence it, the user could just pass in a table that redefines that handler as an empty function

@seblyng
Copy link
Owner

seblyng commented Jan 24, 2025

Yeah I though about it, but I think it is potentially easier to just refer users to the repo if they ask about razor support (and don't read the README), instead of showing how to implement the handler as an empty function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants