You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue #391 checks if enough validators have registered their keys for some proving scheme. Once this check passes, an end block logic should run at some future height to jail validators (both active and inactive ones) without the required key.
This logic should probably run before staking end block.
The create-validator and unjail transactions should have an additional check for presence of required SEDA keys to gatekeep the validator set.
Add invariant to check whether all active validators have keys registered.
Good to have: Batch creation should begin only when at least one proving scheme is enabled (or simply if secp256k1 scheme is enabled)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hacheigriega
changed the title
✨ Jail validators without required SEDA keys
✨ Gatekeep validator set from validators without required SEDA keys
Nov 25, 2024
✨ Feature
Issue #391 checks if enough validators have registered their keys for some proving scheme. Once this check passes, an end block logic should run at some future height to jail validators (both active and inactive ones) without the required key.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: