We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not sure why this benchmark uses an atomic integer, seems to be overkill, no? I would expect this to be already safe: https://github.com/shamsmahmood/savina/blob/master/src/main/scala/edu/rice/habanero/benchmarks/piprecision/PiPrecisionAkkaActorBenchmark.scala#L53
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similar issue are in the SleepingBarber and Philosopher benchmark. They use shared Atomics for communication.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Not sure why this benchmark uses an atomic integer, seems to be overkill, no? I would expect this to be already safe: https://github.com/shamsmahmood/savina/blob/master/src/main/scala/edu/rice/habanero/benchmarks/piprecision/PiPrecisionAkkaActorBenchmark.scala#L53
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: