Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Features and their effect on battery life #397

Open
1 of 4 tasks
TimelessNL opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 7 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

Features and their effect on battery life #397

TimelessNL opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@TimelessNL
Copy link

TimelessNL commented Jun 13, 2023

used Hardware:

  • TWatch 2020 or TWatch 2021
  • M5Paper
  • M5Core2
  • WT32-SC01

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Since week I've been a proud owner of a T-Watch 2020 v3 but unfortunately the battery life leaves much to be desired. I think it would be nice to have some sort of an overview of settings and their effect on battery life. As for me I only have Bluetooth (enable on wakeup) enabled yet my watch only lasts 7ísh hours on a charge. Of course everyone has their use case for a smartwatch, as in my case I would like to receive notifications but with it only lasting 7 hours it can't make it though a normal working day.

Describe the solution you'd like
An overview of settings and their effect on battery life.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Disabling most of the settings as wake on tilt/touch, WiFI, Location. And enabling/disabling experimental battery safe

Additional context
The strange thing is Gadgetbridge can still connect while Bluetooth is disabled, even after a restart of the watch. So somehow Bluetooth is not disabled and maybe other bluetooth settings may be as well and that's why the battery drains so fast? Also I do know that the battery indicator is imprecise, but is it normal that it never reaches 100%?
afbeelding

@GDV0
Copy link
Contributor

GDV0 commented Jun 14, 2023

Hello TimelessNL,

Regarding the current consumption,, you are probably facing the 2 issues #386 and #389 that prohibit switching to lightsleep.
These issues have been fixed 1 or 2 weeks ago.
But I agree that having an idea about power consumption of the different options ( Wifi, Bluetooth, ...) is interesting.

@TimelessNL
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the suggestion 👍, at first I was under the impression that my watch may already have this included as I flashed master beginning of last week. But seeing that the experimental branch has been merged 5 days ago it probably wasn't 😅.

So flashed it just now and indeed the watch behaves differently, when the screen goes off Gadgetbridge looses connection so without looking at the serial log it probably means the watch goes to sleep. Unfortunately this also meant I do not receive any notifications anymore and that is really a smartwatch feature I would like have have.

I did notice @Crsarmv7l mention to disable the always on feature and nothing would be missed, but by doing so the connection to Gadgetbridge is interrupted and no notification/calls will get through. I did also spot a stay on Bluetooth setting but it's unclear to me what the difference is between stay on and always on

@Crsarmv7l
Copy link

Crsarmv7l commented Jun 14, 2023

Thanks for the suggestion 👍, at first I was under the impression that my watch may already have this included as I flashed master beginning of last week. But seeing that the experimental branch has been merged 5 days ago it probably wasn't 😅.

So flashed it just now and indeed the watch behaves differently, when the screen goes off Gadgetbridge looses connection so without looking at the serial log it probably means the watch goes to sleep. Unfortunately this also meant I do not receive any notifications anymore and that is really a smartwatch feature I would like have have.

I did notice @Crsarmv7l mention to disable the always on feature and nothing would be missed, but by doing so the connection to Gadgetbridge is interrupted and no notification/calls will get through. I did also spot a stay on Bluetooth setting but it's unclear to me what the difference is between stay on and always on

The reason I said that is Gadgetbridge implemented notification cache. If the watch is not connected when the notification comes in, gadgetbridge will send it the next time it connects. Admittedly this might not work well for calls though

@TimelessNL
Copy link
Author

Ah that makes more sense indeed. That would work for normal next notifications as they don't require to be instant. Phone calls will be missed as the silent wake interval is much to long.

@Crsarmv7l
Copy link

Crsarmv7l commented Jun 14, 2023

You can look at messing with (I think it is) pmu.json which sets the wakeup intervals

@TimelessNL
Copy link
Author

I've been using the new version for 2 weeks, and must say the battery life has indeed improved.

  • Bluetooth enabled and Bluetooth always on enabled = 8 hours
  • Bluetooth enabled and Bluetooth always on disabled = 46 hours

This 46 hours is quite usable, unfortunately some new issues came to light.

  • The clock is regularly delayed and/or minutes off. A time jump can be observed after a manual wake, sometimes even forward/backwards in multiple iterations. Ex. when waked the watch goes from 12:28(incorrect) -> 11:58 -> 12:43 (correct).
    It does seem that the watch's time is synced once connected with Bluetooth after wake. But shouldn't the RTC take care of maintaining proper time during sleep in the first place?
  • Maybe an issue in Gadgetbridge, but messages do not seem to be queued, sometimes they do but more often than not they don't.

@ktecho
Copy link

ktecho commented Oct 9, 2023

@TimelessNL Have you found the problem with the wrong time after wake in newer versions?

My son wanted to buy the watch and put this firmware, then experiment with it, but it there is a big problem with the RTC, then maybe it's not a good choice... Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants