You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Highway refs are often indicated by route relations, so we need to support them.
One relation may be part of multiple road route relations, each of which has a ref and network tag. They also might be part of no road route relations and have a ref tag. I don't think we need to handle the third case of a ref tag plus refs from relations any different than the first tag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Route relations intentionally provide more structure than way refs, so the two mechanisms aren’t quite equivalent – the structure should persist in the tile’s features to some extent, or it would defeat the purpose of route relations. openmaptiles/openmaptiles#1620 adopts a predictable route_#_key format for properties dissolved from route relations, allowing clients to process each value without resorting to any parsing.1
Highway refs are often indicated by route relations, so we need to support them.
One relation may be part of multiple road route relations, each of which has a ref and network tag. They also might be part of no road route relations and have a ref tag. I don't think we need to handle the third case of a ref tag plus refs from relations any different than the first tag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: