You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was wondering if it possible to expose the parallel sortperm function for "normal" vectors like Vector{Float64} or Vector{Int64}?
Thank you
Kind regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably not (it heavily depends on Dataset). I guess there should be other packages for parallel sorting, and I guess the Basesort should be quite fast for vector{T}. The real benefits of IMD are in the case
Base sort is actually slow compare to other language like c++ boost sorting algorithms which are multi threaded. A parallel sortperm would be very useful for large vectors.
Base sort is actually slow compare to other language like c++ boost sorting algorithms which are multi threaded.
I see. When there is only one column, IMD uses a simple approach for parallel sorting, however for multiple columns and, particularly, in common scenarios of data manipulation tasks (and with QuickSort) it is much more efficient than other algorithms.
I guess, in general, we need some customised algorithms for Vector{T} before being able to expose sortperm to users.
PS I like to see support of other sorting algorithms in IMD (#47 ) and probably we can think about this during that time.
Hi,
I was wondering if it possible to expose the parallel sortperm function for "normal" vectors like Vector{Float64} or Vector{Int64}?
Thank you
Kind regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: