You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of this service stores the contract details to a local level database, upon validation "success".
However, when a user submits a re-verification, the service will return " success" no matter what parameters are provided by the user.
I don't think this is the intended purpose.
Instead, imo the stored level data should be used to compare the newly provided user params, which would avoid having to recompile the contract and spare much of the server's resources.
Please Note: I'm very happy to implement this change, however, I'm currently unable to run the backend locally. When I attempt to run the backend, it fails here:
I know it should be there, because it's mentioned in the .gitignore, but it's not included in the repo. How can I generate (or download) deploycode and fully enable my local implementation?
Thanks,
Shomari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current implementation of this service stores the contract details to a local
level
database, upon validation "success".However, when a user submits a re-verification, the service will return " success" no matter what parameters are provided by the user.
I don't think this is the intended purpose.
Instead, imo the stored
level
data should be used to compare the newly provided user params, which would avoid having to recompile the contract and spare much of the server's resources.Please Note: I'm very happy to implement this change, however, I'm currently unable to run the backend locally. When I attempt to run the backend, it fails here:
sourceverify/backend/verifier.js
Line 272 in 31d87fd
I'm missing the
deploycode
file.I know it should be there, because it's mentioned in the
.gitignore
, but it's not included in the repo. How can I generate (or download)deploycode
and fully enable my local implementation?Thanks,
Shomari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: