-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 225
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for permessage-deflate [✅/awaiting_dependency_merge] #2
Comments
Thanks, it will be done. The only reason not having it already is, we don't use it ourselves, and the library was written for our production use. Note for myself: it is RFC 7692. |
I think I brainfarted when I thought it is mandatory. |
At least it is required by Autobahn, that's enough for me :) Currently tungstenite passes all the Autobahn tests with only two of them as "non-strict", and my plan is to achieve 100% strict (I know what exactly fails). For comparison, ws-rs has 11 non-stricts and others are even worse. So the support for RFC 7692 is needed at least to have 100% green lines here. :) |
It is actually mandatory for a user agent, see step 9 of https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-websocket-establish. |
Is it still planned? ws-rs support permessage-deflate but does not support async :( |
Yes, we still plan to work on it, but unfortunately we did not have time to work on it yet as it was lower in priorities than other things which we fixed / improved since then. |
Fix example not working
Update dependencies
Any updates on this? This is the current state of permessage-deflate in rust's websocket libraries:
|
Someone needs to update the #144 to the newest state (resolve the conflicts and fix some remarks in code), once it's done and clean, we could merge it. Unfortunately we don't plan to make changes at this particular place in the nearest future, but if someone makes a PR and/or updates the existing #144 which seems to be [almost] ready (?), we would be glad to review and merge it. |
We should probably mention @SirCipher to update pull request :) |
@application-developer-DA, @Fedcomp, sorry for the delay, we've been updating to Tokio 0.3. The work is nearly done and I'll update the PR soon. |
Do you have an update? |
@rymnc, the PR is still awaiting a review at the moment. I've got a local branch that's updated to the most recent version for both this repository and |
Okay, np |
Hi, do you have any news about the permessage-deflate support? |
The corresponding PR was closed as the author did not have to time to update it / address the remarks, so he decided to close the PR. The new PRs are welcome ;) |
I'm currently working on this. So far, I've got it to pass some autobahn (no parameter support, so client passes 12, server passes both 12 and 13) by layering compression/decompression on top of the existing flow, so it doesn't need as much code, and it's clearly additive. I don't think there's any major breaking changes.
For now, I'm not planning to implement Later, we should be able to support other compressions like |
Opened #235. Any feedback is appreciated. |
@kazk Is there any assistance needed to help get this PR across the finish line? |
@TheDan64 Once that's merged, I'll open a new PR from a branch using it, which is a rebased version of #235 with header parsing extracted and with better error handling. |
Tried out your rebased branch for our use case and had no issues - appears to be working well. Hope to see this upstreamed sooner than later so that we can use it in production & with the other tungstenite sister libraries |
The implementation by @kazk resides in https://github.com/snapview/tungstenite-rs/tree/permessage-deflate and has been temporarily reverted from a master branch, see the discussion in the PR for more details. |
FWIW, I have rebased branches of all the relevant functions all the way to axum-tungstenite (alternative to axum::extract::ws) to use the permessage-deflate. Tested to work fine. My specific use case needs high performance, and configurable window bits, so there is some hardcoding of window bits as I didn't want to implement full window bits handling yet. I can implement full window bits handling... but I'd want the permessage-deflate implementation by @kazk merged first. hyperium/headers@master...nakedible-p:hyperium-headers:deflate-release |
Would it maybe be a good idea to implement the parsing of the Sec-Websocket-Extensions header into this crate? The PR agains |
Could we make it without |
This is a mandatory part of the spec, and is thus needed to be Web-compatible.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: