-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish patch version to v0.3 upgrade uuid version #288
Comments
@bung87 uuid has been updated in June 2020 (da1f106#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519), but this version marked as 0.4-rc has never been published. @brycekahle I think this package isn't maintained anymore... |
It is definitely maintained, but is in a stable state where things are not upgraded without compelling reasons. |
I have some front end projects using webpack4 which depends on Webpack-dev-server ( -> sockjs-node -> uuid) |
This seems to be an issue only for cryptographically secure functions as Math.Random can not provide this garentee. https://v8.dev/blog/math-random [email protected]: Please upgrade to version 7 or higher. Older versions may use Math.random() in certain circumstances, which is known to be problematic. See https://v8.dev/blog/math-random for details. For webpack-dev-server that would be harmless. As the package is not ment for production anyway. yarn gave me the trace for where this warning was originating. At least I know its not urgent for my use case. |
I would love seeing this package being updated to the latest version of uuid since it's breaking a project I need to take to production by the end of the year.. does anyone know any workaround? |
I had the same issue when adding {
"devDependencies": {
"webpack-dev-server": "^x.x.x"
},
"resolutions": {
"uuid": "^8.3.2"
}
} Hope this helps. |
I don't know if were are talking about uuid stable version or you were talking that sockjs is now 'stable'. Sockjs v0.3.21 doesn't sound like stable. I would expect v1.0.0 according to sem versioning. Also seeing no new versions of sockjs is actually the main reason I will not go for this package, but use socket.io instead. I think its important to at least keep the depedencies up to date. Personally, it looks like a dead project from my perspective. I do NOT want to be rude, but this is how new end-users may see it. |
Any updates when 0.4 is ready? |
@brycekahle While it doesn't appear to break anything, having this output on your npm installs is not nice It's going to affect everyone using webpack-dev-server so maybe easier to do the release than hold off for what feels like "it's not a big enough update to justify 1.0?". Especially if as you say the package is in a stable state I'd imagine there won't be any big updates so what is considered a 'compelling reason' if causing a warning for millions of users is not? |
It's time to release |
Is it hard to release npm package? |
If your changes keep from releasing v1.0.0 maybe we can release v0.3.22 with only |
@jankanty brycekahle said in his answer he won't do this bump up, as he think this package is in stable state. |
uuid v8 will make this package more "stable", because it will remove potential issues, found last years (as it described in warnings on install). |
@jaqua That isn't exactly what I said. I said I don't upgrade things without compelling reasons. As @reporter123 observed, the issue with
The thinking on 0.x releases has shifted over time. Node.js itself was 0.x releases for a long time and used in production. React.js was the same. @zdm Some folks are willing to demand work done by others, but not do the work themselves. I don't see any PRs with this change. The |
Fixed in |
@brycekahle Can I then create new branch from |
@jankanty I went ahead and did it. |
@brycekahle you are a diamond <3 |
current depends on "uuid": "^3.4.0"
uuid latest version is 8.3.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: