Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback Lab 1 #2

Open
ana-oprescu opened this issue Sep 20, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Feedback Lab 1 #2

ana-oprescu opened this issue Sep 20, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@ana-oprescu
Copy link

Exercise 1 Comments Exercise 2 Comments Exercise 3 Comments Exercise 4 Comments Exercise 5 Comments Exercise 6 Comments Exercise 7 Comments Exercise 8 Comments Bonus Exercise 9 Comments Bonus Exercise 10 Comments Total
8 No timing, no discussion about selection 5 No timing, missing answers 5 No timing, missing answers 6 No timing: no function testing 8 No timing: Consider the confidence of the functions that you are using 9 Nice solution. But requested is the smallest counter example not a list of primes. 5 you did not perform tests for invalid card numbers; 9 ->issues 7 ok Euler 9 7 very nice Euler 10; incomplete Euler 49: why did you use the 3330 difference between tuple members? It was not stated as a must-have property of the solution, just as a property of the example. However, very fast implementation. 7.575
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant