Extract participant checklist data

[aridyckovsky]

Problem

We need a collection of data extracted from CSN checklists.

Solution

The following items are requested from the checklists, entered into a CSV with the following requirements:

• The first column has rows for the participant's unique string id (i.e., CSN001).
• Other columns should values of the set of items in the to-do list:
  • Session complete (no: 0, yes: 1)
  • Experimenter initials (PSH, LJA/LA, PTS, KAS, EA, AW)
  • Check distance (mm)
  • Wears glasses or contacts? (no: 0, yes: 1)
  • Validation quality (Good, Fair, Poor)
  • Validation error avg
  • Validation error max
  • Revalidation quality (Good, Fair, Poor)
  • Revalidation error avg
  • Revalidation error max
  • Hits
  • False Alarms
  • Bonus ($)
  • Notes, if substantial

[aridyckovsky]

@psokolhessner let me know if you have any feedback on this extraction list.

[psokolhessner]

Would it make sense @aridyckovsky to include the recorded validation quality & errors, and revalidation quality & errors? I haven't spot-checked these manually-entered values against the extracted ones - if they're literally the same, then of course we don't need them.

Could also record experimenter initials?

[aridyckovsky]

It looks like the above list does not include gender and age of participants. Are those in a specific questionnaire? I see them in the CSN_recruitment spreadsheet in Drive. @psokolhessner should we add these to the checklist extraction if not elsewhere?

[psokolhessner]

@aridyckovsky age & gender were extracted from recruitment information and put in CSVs. The ones on the S drive have age & gender for most participants up through CSN050. I can help finish this if you'd like. Let me know.

[aridyckovsky]

@psokolhessner whoops totally missed that CSV. It's not a major priority at the moment to finish that up. I'll add a new issue for this to keep it tracked.

[psokolhessner]

Agreed that it's not a major priority (for our purposes, the individual differences in attraction ratings are likely to be more important than reported gender). Thanks @aridyckovsky

[aridyckovsky]

Hi @annarini, adding a response here to your questions from the #studies_csn channel on Slack.

For reference:

Hi, when entering the rest of the CSN data, I had a few specific questions on little things, I just didn't want to assume, but are the initials LA and LJA the same? (I added them in the document as they appeared on the scan so LA). There were also some initials that weren't on the github page like AW and EA, but wrote them down as they appeared specifically for CSN 025,028,036. Lastly, for CSN 041 the completion line wasn't filled out the but rest of the data was, so I can assume it was completed but wanted to make sure. Thanks!

Answers:

• The initials for LA and LJA are the same, thanks for catching that! You can also see the original issue checklist, where I've updated the "Experimenter initials" checkbox to reflect the AW initials that were missing before.
• CSN041 is a completed participant, so that's the right call!