Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create code documentation with javadoc #20

Open
dnr2 opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Create code documentation with javadoc #20

dnr2 opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@dnr2
Copy link
Member

dnr2 commented Apr 24, 2013

For better understanding, the code should be commented using javadoc which will give the developers an overall explanation of the most important methods and modules.

dnr2 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2013
rodrigoalvesvieira pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2013
…ing unnecessary blank spaces/lines. Related to #6 and #20.
rodrigoalvesvieira pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2013
…hing more interesting data from the Google Code forge. Successfully could grab one more property: watchers count. Related to #20 and #14.
rodrigoalvesvieira pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2013
…ding 'this' to the references to local object's properties. Related to #6 and #20.
@marlonwc3
Copy link
Contributor

This issue doesn't should be opened like a continuos Issue? Talking about "Issue", this Groundhog entity has a bad doc that can be improved, i will do this Job these days.
To a good project pattern (and remembering this is a open source project where sometimes Contributtors doesn't have communication), i think it's a good idea build strong documentations that can be used to save the time of others contributors and leave the code clean.

@marlonwc3 marlonwc3 reopened this Feb 19, 2014
@rodrigoalvesvieira
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, thanks @marlonwc3. It is a continuous issue.

marlonwc3 referenced this issue Feb 19, 2014
Created more tests that protect all behaviors expected in GitHub
Entities pre-defined by other Groundhog contributor which maybe can be
affected by some code change in basic classes.
Improved Project anotation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants