Is pydust still in active development?

[slonik-az]

Judging by non-bot commits the development of pydust slowed down in the recent month or two. Is it still being developed?

[gatesn]

Hi @slonik-az - yes we're actively developing PyDust features/fixes as and when we require them in our internal Zig/Python package. Is there anything in particular you have found missing or broken?

[slonik-az]

Thanks @gatesn for a prompt reply. I am very excited about pydust and am planning to use in my projects. pydust's use of comptime for ergonomic python C-API bindings is golden!

There are two issues currently on my mind that would be great to fix:

• GC traverse and clear should traverse plain structs #248
• Alternatives to poetry #144

[RonnyPfannschmidt]

im looking into this for potentially providing optional speedups for a few package of mine and non-poetry support is critical for me (ideally hatch and/or setuptools)

[gatesn]

@slonik-az our ergonomic use of comptime is sadly no more: #371

I will try and spend some time thinking about how to move this forwards, but I have to admit it's not my top priority at the moment.

Will gladly accept and review pull requests for smaller fixes, but let's use #371 to discuss a solution to Zig 0.13.0