Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

Consider DequeFile #209

Open
JakeWharton opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Consider DequeFile #209

JakeWharton opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@JakeWharton
Copy link
Collaborator

There's not much reason to be solely a queue when behaving like a stack is trivial. We should consider making QueueFile a DequeFile, perhaps with stack-only or queue-only interfaces? Same for the object mapping layer.

Maybe we ship master as is for Tape 2 and then make this Tape 3. Or we could change QueueFile to an interface so that we can add StackFile and DequeFile later.

@oldergod
Copy link
Member

It probably has to be Kotlin multiplatform.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants