-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rstan/develop doesn't work with stan/develop #588
Comments
It seems that |
I have been hunting down a bug (and mostly trying to grok how r/stan even works internally) where variables get misnamed in the hessian that is output by |
I still don't know what that means and commented as much on @rgiordan's issue to expose them.
That's definitely true of CmdStan. We should clarify that RStan plays by its own rules. |
RStan tries to play by the same rules, but that doesn't seem to stop people
from refactoring things that cause RStan not to build (in this case the
parser)
…On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:09 AM Bob Carpenter ***@***.***> wrote:
Once the hessian and hessian_times_vector methods get exposed in Stan
I still don't know what that means and commented as much on @rgiordan
<https://github.com/rgiordan>'s issue to expose them.
The developer process overview says that submitted changes should keep all
develop branches in working order.
That's definitely true of CmdStan. We should clarify that RStan plays by
its own rules.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#588 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADOrqnLHL7PMGc9ipQp1iUbfMqwFVe0Bks5uvuNSgaJpZM4YjOlV>
.
|
@bgoodri --- what I meant is that I didn't think there was even an attempt right now to keep RStan in a deployable state w.r.t. the current @seantalts or @syclik or @mitzimorris : how much upstream testing of RStan is being done in the Stan CI? I'd like to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen by having enough tests in RStan and enough calls to those tests from Stan to avoid it. If everyone's on board with this, let's try to strengthen our CI testing of RStan upstream. @bgoodri and @mitzimorris : we seem to be missing top-level headers for the language, which would explain why low level files are being called directly. This kind of change should not interrupt RStan's ability to build in general, as there's probably not much reason to be directly including a low-level grammar file (they're mostly mutually recursive, so if you include one, you usually need them all). |
There is a pipeline for it but it errors out for various reasons not all
having to do with renaming grammar header files.
…On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 1:44 PM Bob Carpenter ***@***.***> wrote:
@bgoodri <https://github.com/bgoodri> --- what I meant is that I didn't
think there was even an attempt right now to keep RStan in a deployable
state w.r.t. the current develop branches of stan and math. I'd like to
move in that direction to cut down on time between releasing CmdStan and
releasing RStan.
@seantalts <https://github.com/seantalts> or @syclik
<https://github.com/syclik> or @mitzimorris
<https://github.com/mitzimorris> : how much upstream testing of RStan is
being done in the Stan CI? I'd like to make sure this kind of thing doesn't
happen by having enough tests in RStan and enough calls to those tests from
Stan to avoid it.
If everyone's on board with this, let's try to strengthen our CI testing
of RStan upstream.
@bgoodri <https://github.com/bgoodri> and @mitzimorris
<https://github.com/mitzimorris> : we seem to be missing top-level
headers for the language, which would explain why low level files are being
called directly. This kind of change should not interrupt RStan's ability
to build in general, as there's probably not much reason to be directly
including a low-level grammar file (they're mostly mutually recursive, so
if you include one, you usually need them all).
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#588 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADOrqhGxrrCBPt5Cd0subH_Um6Km-tfHks5uvweVgaJpZM4YjOlV>
.
|
Can we add top-level headers for the language before 2.19? RStan is building again with develop but I have to copy all the .cpp files from lang/ . |
was there a particular header file somewhere? |
I don't think it ever existed
…On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 4:02 PM Mitzi Morris ***@***.***> wrote:
we seem to be missing top-level headers for the language
was there a particular header file somewhere?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#588 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADOrqiWbR6VsPe3OZlh4j5piSzjrnUu0ks5vVWTBgaJpZM4YjOlV>
.
|
Summary:
The
develop
branch ofrstan
does not work with thedevelop
branch ofstan
.Description:
The developer process overview says that submitted changes should keep all
develop
branches in working order. I am trying to make a change tostan
in order to incorporate it intorstan
. (stan-dev/stan#2692 and #587). However, it seems that two twodevelop
branches do not work together.Reproducible Steps:
Update the
install_StanHeaders.R
to check out thedevlop
branches.After running the above
install_StanHeaders.R
script, runmake clean
,make build
, andmake install
instan-dev/rstan/rstan
.Current Output:
... lots of warnings, and the error:
Expected Output:
A successful install of
rstan
.RStan Version:
N/A
R Version:
N/A
Operating System:
Ubuntu 16.04
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: