You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a problem because delegates could vote for something and later change their minds, making community not be able to quickly follow their actions. Also putting the tabulation in a unpredictable outcome for that account influence (and delegated influence).
Its not a security problem, however it can help delegates to mislead their vote at votingPeriod.
A option would be to burn the vote (or make it a blank vote). The problem is if there is already indirect influence claimed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, signed votes are included with no verification to reduce the cost. This should stay as it is.
The problem with this is that it allows a voter to submit 2 different votes, and the tabulation would get into a race condition.
Currently the first tabulated would be the accepted. The retabulation is prevented by this line:
topic-democracy/contracts/democracy/proposal/ProposalBase.sol
Line 87 in 03da756
This is a problem because delegates could vote for something and later change their minds, making community not be able to quickly follow their actions. Also putting the tabulation in a unpredictable outcome for that account influence (and delegated influence).
Its not a security problem, however it can help delegates to mislead their vote at votingPeriod.
A option would be to burn the vote (or make it a blank vote). The problem is if there is already indirect influence claimed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: