Missing properties whose specification is required in certain scenarios from XRechnung 3.0 onwards
#227
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi Erik, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The version history of the current XRechnung 3.0.1 standard, as shown in Appendix C, specifies certain properties as mandatory in certain scenarios. However, some of these properties are not supported by ZUGfERD-csharp. For instance, the TradeAllowanceCharge class lacks a property for percentage allowance/charge. Will the partially mandatory properties resulting from the harmonization of XRechnung with the Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 standard be added before XRechnung 3.0 comes into force?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions