Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sl-exporter should be open sourced (and archive Half-life) #21

Closed
DavidNix opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

sl-exporter should be open sourced (and archive Half-life) #21

DavidNix opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@DavidNix
Copy link
Contributor

DavidNix commented May 8, 2023

Once we feel like sl-exporter is good for an MVP release. I suggest open-sourcing it and archive half-life.

It's rare we get feature or support requests for half-life. However, one less project to maintain is a win for SL. Additionally, half-life is not a good solution at scale, and I would not want to encourage teams to use it if they are monitoring more than a handful of nodes.

@jonathanpberger jonathanpberger changed the title Open source sl-exporter and archive Half-life sl-exporter should be open sourced (and archive Half-life) Mar 11, 2024
@jonathanpberger
Copy link
Contributor

Put under apache in 9717694. Closing ticket.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants