Copy stealing

[ghost]

As already informed and reminded, it's total improper to part take on deliberate stealing and depriving from owner.

See Undertaking to copy-steal Khmer Tipitaka by SC-monks

[ghost]

Aside of the all known fact that the monks and nuns here have not only one time conducted defeat offences (thinking "i have a right to take", is nevertheless not given, like 90 % of the content on SC), my person thinks, less of those involved will be able to bear the legal effects with ease, aside of being well known already everywhere for their shameless miss-conduct, once the many harmed people, institutions, nations, will start to take action possible soon. This is just a small, but highest peak.
And no, it's impossible to do any merits on basic wrong view "I have a right". Not knowing, or ignoring, wouldn't fix the issue. Nothing more harmful as association with fools, therefore, who think that they can cheat for not actually cut away, fallen down. Some of your might still have ways toward better, while the sc-monks and nuns, certain have no more.

Aside of the outwardly heavy issues accumulated here, how can your kind sleep well by having made not only this Dhamma and heritage of many legal useable as toilet paper or warhead decoration items, even sell-able as such. Without bottom once heading after fools.

[ghost]

It's proper and suitable, to avoid further damages, to remove the Sublime Gems heritage and texts from such deluded undertaking, so deluded, that not only misuse but even 'legally' consent to destruction would be given by it.