-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Basic text for describing the BDQ Conceptual Framework Ontology
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
39 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1,40 @@ | ||
BDQ Conceptual Framework Ontology | ||
Title : BDQ Conceptual Framework Ontology | ||
|
||
Namespace URI : http://rs.tdwg.org/bdqffdq/ontology/ | ||
|
||
Preferred namespace abbreviation : bdqffdq: | ||
|
||
Date version issued : {ratification_date} | ||
|
||
Date created : {created_date} | ||
|
||
Part of TDWG Standard : http://www.tdwg.org/standards/[*******] | ||
|
||
This document version : <{current_iri}{ratification_date}> | ||
|
||
Latest version of document : http://rs.tdwg.org/bdq/doc/ffdq/ | ||
|
||
{previous_version_slot} | ||
|
||
Abstract: The BDQ Conceptual Framework ontology formally describes the terms and relationships between them for evaluating the quality of biodiversity data. The Framework also prodives a base for the bdq: and bdqcore: namespace vocabularies. | ||
|
||
Contributors: Lee Belbin, Paul Morris, Arthur Chapman, John Wieczorek, Alan Koch Veiga, Paula F Zermoglio, Alex Thompson, David Lowry, Antonio M Saraiva, Yi Ming Gan, Christian Gendreau, Dmitry Schigel, Tim Robertson | ||
|
||
Creator: TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality Tests and Assertions Task Group, TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality | ||
|
||
Bibliographic citation: TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality Tests and Assertions Task Group Interest Group. <{current_iri}{ratification_date}> | ||
|
||
1 Introduction | ||
This document includes terms used to describe 'data quality' / 'fitness for use' in the context of biodiversity data, see Veiga AK, Saraiva AM, Chapman AD, Morris PJ, Gendreau C, Schigel D, & Robertson TJ (2017). A conceptual framework for quality assessment and management of biodiversity data. PLOS ONE 12 (6): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178731> | ||
|
||
1.1 Status of the content of this document | ||
In Section 4, the values of the Term IRI, Definition and Controlled value are normative. | ||
|
||
1.2 RFC 2119 key words | ||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. | ||
|
||
2 Use of Terms | ||
Due to the requirements of bdqffdq, controlled value strings MUST be used as values of bdqffdq:dataQualityDimension. | ||
|
||
3 Term index |