Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update bdqffdq_termlist-header.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Basic text for describing the BDQ Conceptual Framework Ontology
  • Loading branch information
Tasilee authored Aug 22, 2024
1 parent fb5644c commit 63bdbb2
Showing 1 changed file with 39 additions and 0 deletions.
39 changes: 39 additions & 0 deletions tg2/_review/bdqffdq_termlist-header.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1,40 @@
BDQ Conceptual Framework Ontology
Title : BDQ Conceptual Framework Ontology

Namespace URI : http://rs.tdwg.org/bdqffdq/ontology/

Preferred namespace abbreviation : bdqffdq:

Date version issued : {ratification_date}

Date created : {created_date}

Part of TDWG Standard : http://www.tdwg.org/standards/[*******]

This document version : <{current_iri}{ratification_date}>

Latest version of document : http://rs.tdwg.org/bdq/doc/ffdq/

{previous_version_slot}

Abstract: The BDQ Conceptual Framework ontology formally describes the terms and relationships between them for evaluating the quality of biodiversity data. The Framework also prodives a base for the bdq: and bdqcore: namespace vocabularies.

Contributors: Lee Belbin, Paul Morris, Arthur Chapman, John Wieczorek, Alan Koch Veiga, Paula F Zermoglio, Alex Thompson, David Lowry, Antonio M Saraiva, Yi Ming Gan, Christian Gendreau, Dmitry Schigel, Tim Robertson

Creator: TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality Tests and Assertions Task Group, TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality

Bibliographic citation: TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality Tests and Assertions Task Group Interest Group. <{current_iri}{ratification_date}>

1 Introduction
This document includes terms used to describe 'data quality' / 'fitness for use' in the context of biodiversity data, see Veiga AK, Saraiva AM, Chapman AD, Morris PJ, Gendreau C, Schigel D, & Robertson TJ (2017). A conceptual framework for quality assessment and management of biodiversity data. PLOS ONE 12 (6): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178731>

1.1 Status of the content of this document
In Section 4, the values of the Term IRI, Definition and Controlled value are normative.

1.2 RFC 2119 key words
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.

2 Use of Terms
Due to the requirements of bdqffdq, controlled value strings MUST be used as values of bdqffdq:dataQualityDimension.

3 Term index

0 comments on commit 63bdbb2

Please sign in to comment.