You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it is time that we seriously address the required C++ standards to build an compile new versions of Libalgebra.
Currently I think that the Libalgebra code is somewhere between C++98 compatible and C++11 compatible, which is not a good place to be.
I think the best course of action is to tag the current master branch as a release 0.8 (chosen for no particular reason), and make a new release tagged 1.0 in which we add C++11 as a requirement and adopt C++11 syntax, features, and idioms in the future. This will end the ambiguity in the code.
Any comments?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it is time that we seriously address the required C++ standards to build an compile new versions of Libalgebra.
Currently I think that the Libalgebra code is somewhere between C++98 compatible and C++11 compatible, which is not a good place to be.
I think the best course of action is to tag the current master branch as a release 0.8 (chosen for no particular reason), and make a new release tagged 1.0 in which we add C++11 as a requirement and adopt C++11 syntax, features, and idioms in the future. This will end the ambiguity in the code.
Any comments?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: