You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The UKF fusion filter works fairly well, but is costly on CPU. It has to be compiled with optimisations to run fast enough, and even then chews a good chunk of a CPU core running @ 1000 Hz. A big part of this is the delay slot setup to compensate for video capture and processing latency, which expands the UKF state matrix and UKF cost grows at O(n^3) unfortunately.
Some other avenues to explore are:
Don't do full Kalman state updates at full IMU rate, but instead integrate the IMU readiings most of the time and only do Kalman measurements / corrections at a lower rate.
Try an implementation of the Square Root UKF to reduce the update cost
Look at implementations like ILLIXR have for SLAM using an EKF-based MSCKF formulation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The UKF fusion filter works fairly well, but is costly on CPU. It has to be compiled with optimisations to run fast enough, and even then chews a good chunk of a CPU core running @ 1000 Hz. A big part of this is the delay slot setup to compensate for video capture and processing latency, which expands the UKF state matrix and UKF cost grows at O(n^3) unfortunately.
Some other avenues to explore are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: