Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend lists of supported OSs for upstream too #2773

Closed
aneta-petrova opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3632
Closed

Extend lists of supported OSs for upstream too #2773

aneta-petrova opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3632

Comments

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member

          Has to be extended for operating systems supported by foreman/katello and orcharhino. Works for now IMHO.

Originally posted by @maximiliankolb in #2607 (comment)

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

Applies to these modules:

  • con_supported-client-architectures-configuration-management.adoc
  • con_supported-client-architectures-content-management.adoc
    • con_supported-client-architectures-host-management.adoc

@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova changed the title Has to be extended for operating systems supported by foreman/katello and orcharhino. Works for now IMHO. Extend lists of supported OSs for upstream too Feb 9, 2024
@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor

  • guides/common/modules/con_supported-client-architectures-for-configuration-management.adoc
  • guides/common/modules/con_supported-client-architectures-for-content-management.adoc
  • guides/common/modules/con_supported-client-architectures-for-host-provisioning.adoc

Do not need any changes because they're Satellite-only. The list of supported Client OS in guides/common/modules/snip_supported-client-operating-systems.adoc LGTM.

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb linked a pull request Jan 31, 2025 that will close this issue
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants