You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be useful to be able to perform orbital optimization. With the recent work of @ShuoyangW , we have the gradient (and soon, the Hessian) with respect to orbitals. Being able to wrap PyCI in an orbital optimizer is a good thing.
This basically means that one needs to be able to consider PyCI a function where 1- and 2-electron integrals are read in, and the energy and 1- and 2-electron density matrices come out. This then needs to be wrapped in another function that takes 1- and 2-electron integrals and performs a unitary transformation of them based on the step accepted from an optimizer, as the optimizer expects to receive the energy, gradient, and (perhaps) Hessian as a function of an argument (probably the antiHermitian matrix that generates the unitary transformation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be useful to be able to perform orbital optimization. With the recent work of @ShuoyangW , we have the gradient (and soon, the Hessian) with respect to orbitals. Being able to wrap
PyCI
in an orbital optimizer is a good thing.This basically means that one needs to be able to consider
PyCI
a function where 1- and 2-electron integrals are read in, and the energy and 1- and 2-electron density matrices come out. This then needs to be wrapped in another function that takes 1- and 2-electron integrals and performs a unitary transformation of them based on the step accepted from an optimizer, as the optimizer expects to receive the energy, gradient, and (perhaps) Hessian as a function of an argument (probably the antiHermitian matrix that generates the unitary transformation).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: